2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 140 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |