2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,725 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 55 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1975 Sunbeam Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine. (123 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1975 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Mazda | Sunbeam |
| Model | 6 | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |
