2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 TVR 3000 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1975 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | 6 | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |