2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1975 TVR 3000.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1975 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Mazda | TVR |
| Model | 6 | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2183 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2290 mm |
