2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1975 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 1300. (94 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: