2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Celica. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1588 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 70 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |