2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1977 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1977 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1977 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1977 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Mazda | NSU |
| Model | 6 | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 37 L |
