2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1977 Rover 3500
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 3500 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1977 Rover 3500. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1977 Rover 3500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 178 kg more than 1977 Rover 3500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Rover 3500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rover 3500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1977 Rover 3500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 3500 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 3532 cc |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 203 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1372 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2820 mm |
