2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1980 Renault 20
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 417 kg more than 1980 Renault 20.
Because 2009 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Renault 20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1980 Renault 20 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | 20 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1647 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |