2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1980 Simca 1309
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Simca 1309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Simca 1309 would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1980 Simca 1309. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Simca 1309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1980 Simca 1309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Simca 1309. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Simca 1309.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1980 Simca 1309 | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | 6 | 1309 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1592 cc |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
