2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 6 | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 86.4 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2550 mm |