2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1981 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Simca 2 Litres weights approximately 170 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1981 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Simca 2 Litres has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Simca 2 Litres will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1981 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | 6 | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2670 mm |