2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
