2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 6 | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2550 mm |