2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1984 Peugeot Quasar
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Peugeot Quasar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Peugeot Quasar would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Peugeot Quasar (600 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 430 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1984 Peugeot Quasar is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. (133 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. 1984 Peugeot Quasar has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Peugeot Quasar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1984 Peugeot Quasar | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | Quasar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1599 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 600 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |