2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1985 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1985 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 2212 cc |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |