2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 780. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 780 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Volvo 780 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Volvo 780 (145 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Volvo 780 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Volvo 780 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Volvo 780. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Volvo 780 (236 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1985 Volvo 780 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 6 | 780 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 11.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
