2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1986 Holden Barina
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Barina would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1986 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Barina. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Barina. 1986 Holden Barina has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Holden Barina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1986 Holden Barina | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 6 | Barina |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |