2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1986 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 626. (117 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 626 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 626. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1986 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 6 | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1082 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |