2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1986 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 6 | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 74 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2040 mm |