2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1987 Holden Camira
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Holden Camira (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1987 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6. 1987 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1987 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Camira |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
