2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1989 Volvo 460
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 460. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 460. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 460 weights approximately 101 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 460. (175 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1989 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 460 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |