2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 6 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
