2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |