2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 TVR Type S
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 TVR Type S would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 TVR Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1993 TVR Type S.
Because 1993 TVR Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 TVR Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1993 TVR Type S | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | 6 | Type S |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2300 mm |