2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 125 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1994 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 6 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2440 mm |
