2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 200 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
