2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 214. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 214 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1995 Rover 214. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 214. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 323 kg more than 1995 Rover 214. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 214. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 214.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1995 Rover 214 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 214 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1396 cc |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |