2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 674 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | 6 | MK VI |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 620 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |
