2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (182 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | 6 | MK VII |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2183 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |
