2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna (141 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 419 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Magna (205 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6 | Magna |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 205 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 86.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |