2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 179 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | 6 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1834 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2450 mm |
