2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 6 | 300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |