2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo S80 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo S80 (380 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 1996 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1996 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | S80 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2978 cc |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2800 mm |