2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1998 Proton 400
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1998 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 359 kg more than 1998 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1998 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 6 | 400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1299 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |