2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 605 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 6 | Profile |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |
