2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 6 | 400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |