2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 326 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 6 | SCC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2487 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
