2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 489 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 6 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 799 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 20.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 22 L |