2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Proton Impian

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton Impian. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton Impian would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2003 Proton Impian. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Proton Impian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Impian. (140 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Impian. 2003 Proton Impian has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Proton Impian will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: