2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Renault Be Bop
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Be Bop. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Be Bop would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Be Bop (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2003 Renault Be Bop.
Because 2003 Renault Be Bop is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Be Bop (300 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Be Bop will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2003 Renault Be Bop | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Be Bop |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |