2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Saleen S7
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Saleen S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Saleen S7 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 446 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Saleen S7 weights approximately 292 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Saleen S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Saleen S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 2003 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Mazda | Saleen |
| Model | 6 | S7 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 322 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 3.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2692 mm |
