2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Saturn L
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Saturn L would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2003 Saturn L. (135 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 Saturn L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Saturn L. (199 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Saturn L.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2003 Saturn L | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 6 | L |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 2196 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 199 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |