2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | 6 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1779 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2320 mm |