2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 724 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 5556 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 106 L |