2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Peugeot 406 (156 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 406 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 406.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Peugeot 406 (205 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Peugeot 406 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2004 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | 406 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2230 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1350 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |