2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Renault Megane. (96 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Megane. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2004 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Megane |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1461 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |