2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (182 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 218 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (400 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Pontiac Montana. (278 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Pontiac Montana. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 6 2005 Pontiac Montana
Make Mazda Pontiac
Model 6 Montana
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Station Wagon Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2183 cc 3491 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 186 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 278 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 16.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2950 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.6 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 95 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]