2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (192 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 48 L |