2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |